Comparison of experiment on the crime prevention glass and crime prevention film
List of comparison between the crime prevention glass and crime prevention film
| Comparison point | The crime prevention glass | Crime prevention film | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crime prevention | Zochitosei | Construction person's technology is not controlled. | It is controlled. (area for pulling out water, ventilator shortage, and surrounding unbonded parts) |
| Thickness of resin | 30 mills =0.76milli 60 mills =1.52milli 90 mills =2.28milli - There is "Polycarbonate" 1.5milli used also for the bullet-proof glass, too. | 350 micron =0.35milli - 350Less than micron cannot display the crime prevention film. - There is a big fault on which degree of adhesion falls when the thick one is pasted to raise crime prevention. - Especially, it is difficult to paste the thick one to the template glass (There is Decoboco) firmly. | |
| Structure etc. | It is heating Oki in two all aspects of the glass. | Ha, one side, and picture frame post-Ha(The space is in all sides. ) | |
| Cutting method | The machine cutting in the factory is a principle. - There is a special cutting system that has applied for the GA patent. | Normal temperature cutter cutting in site | |
| Durability | Ca ..change.. none of passing age | There are a wound and cloudiness by the wipe cleaning. There is paste discoloration by the sun light. It constructs incompletely (peel off), and there is an aged deterioration. Peeling off from four corners | |
| Cost load | It only first time | It is pasting substitution of each glass in five years if it is long and ten years earlier. | |
| Introduction cost | Our company 60 GC hyper mills Glass fee +25,000 yen/m ² Construction fee +9,000 yen/piece Transportation overhead +11,000 yen/matter | The certain manufacturer crime prevention film +28,000 yen/m ² Zaicou all-in - However, +3,000 yen/m ² improvement of site of less than 20m ² | |
| Example of reference Household and construction area = ²/7m eightpieces | The glass fee: 25,000 yen ~7=175000 yen Construction fee: 9,000 yen ~8=72,000 yen Transportation overhead 11,000 yen Total 258,000 yen | ~ (28,000 yen +3,000 yen)7=217,000 yen | |
- Note: Please confirm the opinion of the film manufacturer because the above-mentioned is our integrated opinion.
Destruction experiment and strength comparison between the crime prevention glass and crime prevention film
- Destruction method: Breaking ..crowding.. test that uses minus driver(a lot of ways in the glass breaking with)
- The destruction time: It is time in open lock as for the Crescent part and the part of a supplementary lock.
FL3(generally, 3milli transparency glass used)
It is bright to break two places, and only about 25 seconds. It invades easily at about ten seconds if there is no supplementary lock.
Crime prevention film(360 micron =0.36 millis)
- It is 350 microns or more of the crime prevention building part recognition condition.
When the glass cracks once, it is possible to peel off the film easily by putting Mainasdorarbar between the glass and the film.
The glass of the overall film pasting also had little time difference in the swallow part this time to say nothing of general "Picture frame Ha" (simple method by which the film was not pasted to the place aimed by breaking because the film was not pasted to = sash swallow part) though experimented.
The crime prevention glass"GC hyper 60"
(FL2.5 milli + special middle film 1.52milli + FL2.5 milli)
It was not possible to puncture it up to the size like above-mentioned "Crime prevention film" though "Breaking" was executed considering "Five minutes" that was regulations at the government and the people combination conference to damage two places.
Thickness became a result between the glass and the glass the proof of the feature of the crime prevention glass that manufactured the heating pressure wear to all aspects of the glass obviously about four times the special middle film.
The sweat spouted, and the breath went up in those who executed it, too. Because physical strength doesn't have only opening only one place in the Crescent part beautifully, it actually seems that "It gives up and return"'s is a reality.
GCH60 and 375μ"Breaking" (small hammer) test result of film
y crime prevention glass (GC hyper 60) breaking experiment z
y double-glazed glass FL3+A6+FL3 (356μ film pasting) breaking experiment z
It is meaningless in the cc breaking to which the hole opens by one time.
375μ'Obtuse angle' like the point of the bat often used In "Breaking" and the demonstration by a minus driver in case of being though hurried strength is demonstrated in shock in Mono, 'Acute angle' The thing said that it is complete and it powerless is understood in the hammer etc.
